Inflation is “Roaring”, and “Galloping”. Who’s Behind All This?


Inflation is roaring. (Stephen Castle, With inflation roaring, EU proposes reduced sales taxes, International Herald Tribune, 7 July 2008 )

So is inflation a lion?

Send out the hunters and stop this lion!


Wait. Nobody has even seen this lion.

What do people see? Oh, just higher prices. A year or two ago the walnuts cost 1.59. Now they cost 1.89.


And that’s inflation?

A persistent increase in the level of consumer prices or a persistent decline in
the purchasing power of money, caused by an increase in available currency and
credit beyond the proportion of available goods and services. (

Ah, this makes things easier to understand. We’re not dealing with a lion at all. Its just a problem with too much available currency and “credit”.


So who’s responsible?

If its not a lion, who might be behind all this?

Maybe a horse. After all, inflation is galloping.
(Lalatendu Mishra, Galloping inflation hurts exporters, Hindustan Times, 18 July 2008 )

But since when do horses control the supply of money (paper money)?


No, we have to look at the usual address when large sums of money are involved:

1. To what I reported to you at the last meeting I shall now add a detailedexplanation of internal loans. Of foreign loans I shall say nothing more, because they have fed us with the national moneys of the GOYIM, but for our State there will be no foreigners, that is, nothing external.

2. We have taken advantage of the venality of administrators and slackness of rulers to get our moneys twice, thrice and more times over, by lending to the GOY governments moneys which were not at all needed by the States. Could anyone do the like in regard to us? …. Therefore, I shall only deal with the details of internal loans.
3. States announce that such a loan is to be concluded and open subscriptions for their own bills of exchange, that is, for their interest-bearing paper. That they may be within the reach of all the price is determined at from a hundred to a thousand; and a discount is made for the earliest subscribers. Next day by artificial means the price of them goes up, the alleged reason being that everyone is rushing to buy them. In a few days the treasury safes are, as they say, overflowing and there’s more money than they can do with (why then take it?) The subscription, it is alleged, covers many times over the issue total of the loan; in this lies the whole stage effect – look you, they say, what confidence is shown in the government’s bills of exchange.
4. But when the comedy is played out there emerges the fact that a debit and an exceedingly burdensome debit has been created. For the payment of interest it becomes necessary to have recourse to new loans, which do not swallow up but only add to the capital debt. And when this credit is exhausted it becomes necessary by new taxes to cover, not the loan, BUT ONLY THE INTEREST ON IT. These taxes are a debit employed to cover a debit …. (Hence THE CRY TO BALANCE THE BUDGET!) Protocol 21

Seems that the Jew controls credit. And banks. (Nathanael Kapner, Federal Reserve: A Private Jew Bank Strangling America!, They run the Federal Reserve, which prints all that paper.


So its not really the inflation which is roaring, or even galloping. Its just Jews working their usual pranks and tricks with money.

What? “Usual” tricks?

Maybe this has happened before.


We consider the special law of 1780 against the rising tide of foreign Jews. (“fremde Bettel-Juden”) These people were active in trade and usury.

Their business tactics included fraud, theft, fencing, and usury. (Ilja Mieck, Land und Leute und die Existenzbedingungen im Staat Friedrichs II, in Friedrich der Große. Herrscher zwischen Tradition und Fortschritt, Bertelsmann Verlag, 1991, p. 116)

Why would a special law against Jewish practices even be necessary?


Quite simple. They had been allowed back into the country.

The Jews had been expelled from Brandenburg-Preussen in 1573. Grounds? Fraud, usury, and the vice trade.

Just 90 years later, they got back in. In 1663, the Jewish weapon and coin dealer Israel Aron was permitted to set up shop in Berlin. He became a Hofjude to the Grand Kurfürst Friedrich Wilhelm. This means the Jew could visit the Royal Court and ply his usury trade.


This Jew didn’t stay lonesome for long. In 1671, the Kurfürst allowed 50 Jewish families who had been expelled from Vienna to come and live in Brandenburg. They could live there if they paid a Schützgeld. In the early 1700s, the Jews in Berlin built their first synagogue.

That’s just 300 years ago. Now they run the place.

The German rulers thought they could control the Jews. For example, in 1730, Friedrich Wilhelm put out the rule that the number of Schützjuden living in his province could not increase.

What’s that, you ask.

Its a Jew living under protection of the king. Back in those days, political correctness was nonexistant, and if the Jews hadn’t had the protection of the king, they would not have been tolerated by the common people. (Achim von Borries, Die Rolle der Juden und ihre Existenzbedingungen unter Friedrich II, in Friedrich der Große. Herrscher zwischen Tradition und Fortschritt, Bertelsmann Verlag, 1991, p. 163)


The kings of Prussia knew what they were doing. We consider the political testament of the king from 1752:

Die Juden sind von allen diesen Sekten die Gefährlichsten, weil sie den Handelder Christen schädigen, und weil sie fuer den Staat unbrauchbar sind. Wir haben dieses Volk noetig, um bestimmten Handel mit Polen zu treiben, aber man muss verhindern dass ihre Zahl wächst, und sie nicht nur auf eine bestimmte Zahl von Familien, sondern auf eine bestimmte Zahl von Köpfen festlegen, ihren Handel beschränken und sie hindern, Unternehmungen im grossen zu machen, denn sie sollen nur Kleinhaendler sein. (id., p. 165)

The Jews are of all the religions the most dangerous, because they damage the business interests of the Christians, and because they are useless for this state. We need these people for certain business dealing with Poland, but we must make certain that their numbers do not increase. Not just limiting the number of their families, but also limited the number of Jewish persons here. We need to restrict their business dealings, and hinder them from engaging in big business, because they should just be small traders.

This is reminiscent of a certain experiment in Egypt discussed here. It just doesn’t work.

Once you let Jews in the door, they take over. As we saw here.

The king recognized that an expansion of Jewish influence would be a cancerous danger to the German people. (id.)

Naturally, after Jews got in the door, their influence expanded. In 1730, the Jew David Hirsch started a factory in Potsdam. (id., p. 164)


The kings knew the danger, but Prussia was often at war. Wars cost a lot of money.

In 1758, Veitel Heine Ephraim, Daniel Itzig, and Moses Isaac put together a consortium. They coined all the money. This helped Friedrich II in his wars. However, the common people hated these Jews. They called the coins Ephraimiten.

The money looked good on the outside, but base metal inside. On the outside Friedrich, and on the inside Ephraim. This money was adulterated.

The Jews were in no way motivated by a love of Preussen or Germany. It was pure greed. (id., p. 166)

Pure greed! Where has we seen that before?

Right here, of course.

Here, we explored the Jewish practice of clipping the coin. Whether we’re talking England, Prussia, or the United States, when the money is adulterated, the people become poorer.

And needless to say, the Jew becomes richer and richer. After all, that is their dream.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s